Building a Web3 Game: The Web3 Gaming Infra Stack (Part 1)

Joan Alavedra
Game02Article.svg

Welcome to the first installment of our three-part series aimed at game developers interested in diving into the world of Web3. As blockchain technology continues to disrupt various industries, the gaming sector is no exception. This series aims to provide a comprehensive guide to understanding, adopting, and excelling in Web3 gaming.

Whether you're a seasoned game developer or a newcomer curious about blockchain, this series has something for everyone. Let's start by laying down the foundation in Part 1: Introduction to Web3 Gaming Infrastructure.

Why Blockchain? Reasoning 101

As a game studio, the first question you must grapple with is, "Why blockchain?" The gaming industry is already a melting pot of various trends—be it the Creator Economy, cloud gaming, or user-generated content. So, diving into blockchain technology isn't a decision to be taken lightly; the stakes are high.

At its core, blockchain technology offers a unique set of advantages that are revolutionizing various sectors, gaming included. These advantages can be categorized into four main pillars: verifiable ownership, immutability, decentralization, and security.

In the context of gaming, these pillars translate into tangible benefits like transparent game operations, ownership of digital assets, and immutable gaming records.

- The Importance of Cooperation The essence of Community Economics is cooperation. Traditional gaming models are often one-sided and sometimes even exploitative. Blockchain gaming, on the other hand, thrives on mutual benefits. By fostering a cooperative environment, everyone in the ecosystem stands to gain, encapsulating the idea that "a rising tide lifts all boats."

- The Role of Interoperability Interoperability is crucial for the long-term sustainability of Community Economics. It allows for seamless interactions between different blockchain platforms, thereby preventing the formation of isolated ecosystems. This is beneficial for both developers, who can tap into a broader market, and players, who enjoy greater freedom and liquidity for their digital assets.

- The Power of Composability Another noteworthy feature of blockchain is composability, which allows developers to build upon existing applications or smart contracts and players to create traceble content. This accelerates the development process and opens up new possibilities, akin to how compound interest works in finance.

Onchain vs Offchain

In the evolving domain of web3 gaming, developers face a pivotal decision: whether to build their games on-chain, off-chain, or a hybrid of both. On-chain gaming, leveraging blockchain technology, offers unparalleled digital ownership, transparency, new design opportunities, and innovative monetization models. In contrast, traditional off-chain games rely on centralized servers and databases, with game systems controlled solely by the developer or publisher.

Key Game Design Elements

On-Chain Components:

Tokenization: Introducing digital tokens for in-game items, characters, or collectibles, ensuring genuine ownership and facilitating player-led economies. Decentralized Governance: Implementing DAOs for player involvement in game development decisions, promoting community engagement.

Off-Chain Components:

Game Mechanics and UI: Maintaining intricate game interactions and user interfaces off-chain due to blockchain limitations in processing speed and scalability. Gameplay Dynamics: Processing dynamic gameplay elements off-chain to ensure seamless player experiences.

What Obstacles Players and Developers Face?

For Players

1. Complex Onboarding Experience: Players must navigate through multiple steps including installing browser wallets, potential undergoing Know Your Customer (KYC) verifications, purchasing native tokens, approving obscure transaction requests, and covering gas fees. 2. Security Risks in Self-Custody: Players shoulder the burden of safely storing seed phrases, facing the possibility of irreversible loss or compromise.

For Developers

1. Navigating Unfamiliar Terrain: Teams grapple with complex topics like limited computational resources, adversarial circumstances, and smart contract security, which divert their attention from core game development. 2. Absence of Best Practices: The fast-paced advancements in technology, frequent updates to protocols, and continuously emerging problem-solving methods result in a volatile landscape. 3. Balancing Open Economies: Teams must safeguard the sustainability of token economies without undermining the gaming experience, while also defending against bot activity. 4. User Outreach and Sustained Engagement: In a digital realm filled with bots and pseudonymous identities, executing effective cohort analyses and targeted user acquisition (UA) strategies presents a formidable challenge. 5. Regulatory Conformance: Adapting to an ever-shifting regulatory landscape poses its own unique set of difficulties.

Gaming Infraestructure: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

Screenshot 2023-09-27 at 17.24.12-min.png

The Good: Shared Building Blocks

In the realm of blockchain gaming, many of the foundational tools remain consistent with traditional Web2 gaming. Whether it's asset creation, real-time engines, or cloud back-ends, the same companies and tools are often in play. For instance, Lost Dungeon utilizes PlayFab and Azure functions on the backend to host the onboarding and game logic.

These shared building blocks—creative software, scalable servers, and data-driven optimization—are as vital to blockchain games as they are to any Free-To-Play mobile game.

The Bad: The Complexity of Blockchain Integration

The landscape changes dramatically when you delve into the blockchain-specific aspects of game development. Every feature or decision you make necessitates a uniquely blockchain-oriented piece of software.

Although the barriers of entry and exiting are being reduced across chains, the first and most critical decision is selecting your first blockchain, which sets the stage for other functionalities like gas fees, dev tooling, and community.

With time this implementations would be as easy as selecting your right gaming backend. The maturity of teh dev tooling is in progress.

The Ugly: The Uncertain Coexistence of Web2 and Web3

While Web2 isn't going away anytime soon, its relationship with Web3 is still evolving. Companies like Epic Games are opening up to blockchain, contrasting sharply with Valve's decision to ban NFTs from Steam. This creates a fragmented landscape where Web2 and Web3 technologies coexist but under varying degrees of acceptance and integration.

At Openfort, we're doing the conscious effort to build integrations with well-known gaming backend providers or identity platform to simply how developers can build backends with Openfort in a blink of an eye. Integration with PlayFab, Firebase or starting with Railway it's today, a reality.

Share this article